@article{Vazquez2013a,

title = {User Activity Tracking in DS-CDMA Systems},

author = {Manuel A Vazquez and Joaquin Miguez},

url = {http://www.tsc.uc3m.es/~jmiguez/papers/P39_2013_User Activity Tracking in DS-CDMA Systems.pdf http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/lpdocs/epic03/wrapper.htm?arnumber=6473922},

issn = {0018-9545},

year  = {2013},

date = {2013-01-01},

journal = {IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology},

volume = {62},

number = {7},

pages = {3188--3203},

abstract = {In modern multiuser communication systems, users are allowed to enter or leave the system at any given time. Thus, the number of active users is an unknown and time-varying parameter, and the performance of the system depends on how accurately this parameter is estimated over time. The so-called problem of user identification, which consists of determining the number and identities of users transmitting in a communication system, is usually solved prior to, and hence independently of, that posed by the detection of the transmitted data. Since both problems are tightly connected, a joint solution is desirable. In this paper, we focus on direct-sequence (DS) code-division multiple-access (CDMA) systems and derive, within a Bayesian framework, different receivers that cope with an unknown and time-varying number of users while performing joint channel estimation and data detection. The main feature of these receivers, compared with other recently proposed schemes for user activity detection, is that they are natural extensions of existing maximum a posteriori (MAP) equalizers for multiple-input-multiple-output communication channels. We assess the validity of the proposed receivers, including their reliability in detecting the number and identities of active users, by way of computer simulations.},

keywords = {Activity detection, activity tracking, Bayes methods, Bayesian framework, Channel estimation, code division multiple access, code-division multiple access (CDMA), computer simulations, data detection, direct sequence code division multiple-access, DS-CDMA systems, Equations, joint channel and data estimation, joint channel estimation, Joints, MAP equalizers, Mathematical model, maximum a posteriori, MIMO communication, Multiaccess communication, multiple-input-multiple-output communication chann, multiuser communication systems, per-survivor processing (PSP), radio receivers, Receivers, sequential Monte Carlo (SMC) methods, time-varying number, time-varying parameter, Vectors, wireless channels},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Salamanca2012b,

title = {Bayesian Equalization for LDPC Channel Decoding},

author = {Luis Salamanca and Juan Jose Murillo-Fuentes and Fernando Perez-Cruz},

url = {http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/lpdocs/epic03/wrapper.htm?arnumber=6129544},

issn = {1053-587X},

year  = {2012},

date = {2012-01-01},

journal = {IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing},

volume = {60},

number = {5},

pages = {2672--2676},

abstract = {We describe the channel equalization problem, and its prior estimate of the channel state information (CSI), as a joint Bayesian estimation problem to improve each symbol posterior estimates at the input of the channel decoder. Our approach takes into consideration not only the uncertainty due to the noise in the channel, but also the uncertainty in the CSI estimate. However, this solution cannot be computed in linear time, because it depends on all the transmitted symbols. Hence, we also put forward an approximation for each symbol's posterior, using the expectation propagation algorithm, which is optimal from the Kullback-Leibler divergence viewpoint and yields an equalization with a complexity identical to the BCJR algorithm. We also use a graphical model representation of the full posterior, in which the proposed approximation can be readily understood. The proposed posterior estimates are more accurate than those computed using the ML estimate for the CSI. In order to illustrate this point, we measure the error rate at the output of a low-density parity-check decoder, which needs the exact posterior for each symbol to detect the incoming word and it is sensitive to a mismatch in those posterior estimates. For example, for QPSK modulation and a channel with three taps, we can expect gains over 0.5 dB with same computational complexity as the ML receiver.},

keywords = {Approximation methods, Bayes methods, Bayesian equalization, Bayesian estimation problem, Bayesian inference, Bayesian methods, BCJR (Bahl\textendashCocke\textendashJelinek\textendashRaviv) algorithm, BCJR algorithm, Channel Coding, channel decoding, channel equalization, channel equalization problem, Channel estimation, channel state information, CSI, Decoding, equalisers, Equalizers, expectation propagation, expectation propagation algorithm, fading channels, graphical model representation, intersymbol interference, Kullback-Leibler divergence, LDPC, LDPC coding, low-density parity-check decoder, Modulation, parity check codes, symbol posterior estimates, Training},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Vazquez2011,

title = {A Per-Survivor Processing Receiver for MIMO Transmission Systems With One Unknown Channel Order Per Output},

author = {Manuel A Vazquez and Joaquin Miguez},

url = {http://www.tsc.uc3m.es/~jmiguez/papers/P31_2011_A Per-Survivor Processing Receiver for MIMO Transmission Systems With One Unknown Channel Order Per Output.pdf http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/lpdocs/epic03/wrapper.htm?arnumber=6032763},

issn = {0018-9545},

year  = {2011},

date = {2011-01-01},

journal = {IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology},

volume = {60},

number = {9},

pages = {4415--4426},

abstract = {The order of a communications channel is the length of its impulse response. Recently, several works have tackled the problem of estimating the order of a frequency-selective multiple-input-multiple-output (MIMO) channel. However, all of them consider a single order, despite the fact that a MIMO channel comprises several subchannels (specifically, as many as the number of inputs times the number of outputs), each one possibly with its own order. In this paper, we introduce an algorithm for maximum-likelihood sequence detection (MLSD) in frequency- and time-selective MIMO channels that incorporates full estimation of the MIMO channel impulse response (CIR) coefficients, including one channel order per output. Simulation results following the analytical derivation of the algorithm suggest that the proposed receiver can achieve significant improvements in performance when transmitting through a MIMO channel that effectively comprises subchannels of different lengths.},

keywords = {Channel estimation, communication channel, Complexity theory, dynamic programming, frequency-selective MIMO channel, frequency-selective multiple-input multiple-output, maximum likelihood detection, maximum likelihood sequence detection, maximum likelihood sequence estimation, MIMO, MIMO channel impulse response coefficient, MIMO communication, MIMO transmission system, multipath channels, mutiple-input\textendashmultiple-output (MIMO), per-survivor processing receiver, Receiving antennas, Signal processing algorithms, time-selective MIMO channel, Transmitting antennas, Viterbi algorithm},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Olmos2010a,

title = {Joint Nonlinear Channel Equalization and Soft LDPC Decoding with Gaussian Processes},

author = {Pablo M Olmos and Juan Jose Murillo-Fuentes and Fernando Perez-Cruz},

url = {http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/lpdocs/epic03/wrapper.htm?arnumber=5290078},

issn = {1053-587X},

year  = {2010},

date = {2010-01-01},

journal = {IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing},

volume = {58},

number = {3},

pages = {1183--1192},

abstract = {In this paper, we introduce a new approach for nonlinear equalization based on Gaussian processes for classification (GPC). We propose to measure the performance of this equalizer after a low-density parity-check channel decoder has detected the received sequence. Typically, most channel equalizers concentrate on reducing the bit error rate, instead of providing accurate posterior probability estimates. We show that the accuracy of these estimates is essential for optimal performance of the channel decoder and that the error rate output by the equalizer might be irrelevant to understand the performance of the overall communication receiver. In this sense, GPC is a Bayesian nonlinear classification tool that provides accurate posterior probability estimates with short training sequences. In the experimental section, we compare the proposed GPC-based equalizer with state-of-the-art solutions to illustrate its improved performance.},

keywords = {Bayesian nonlinear classification tool, Bit error rate, Channel Coding, channel equalizers, Channel estimation, Coding, equalisers, equalization, error statistics, Gaussian processes, GPC, joint nonlinear channel equalization, low-density parity-check (LDPC), low-density parity-check channel decoder, Machine learning, nonlinear channel, nonlinear codes, parity check codes, posterior probability estimates, soft LDPC decoding, soft-decoding, support vector machine (SVM)},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Perez-Cruz2008c,

title = {Nonlinear Channel Equalization With Gaussian Processes for Regression},

author = {Fernando Perez-Cruz and Juan Jose Murillo-Fuentes and S Caro},

url = {http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/lpdocs/epic03/wrapper.htm?arnumber=4563433},

issn = {1053-587X},

year  = {2008},

date = {2008-01-01},

journal = {IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing},

volume = {56},

number = {10},

pages = {5283--5286},

abstract = {We propose Gaussian processes for regression (GPR) as a novel nonlinear equalizer for digital communications receivers. GPR's main advantage, compared to previous nonlinear estimation approaches, lies on their capability to optimize the kernel hyperparameters by maximum likelihood, which improves its performance significantly for short training sequences. Besides, GPR can be understood as a nonlinear minimum mean square error estimator, a standard criterion for training equalizers that trades off the inversion of the channel and the amplification of the noise. In the experiment section, we show that the GPR-based equalizer clearly outperforms support vector machine and kernel adaline approaches, exhibiting outstanding results for short training sequences.},

keywords = {Channel estimation, digital communications receivers, equalisers, equalization, Gaussian processes, kernel adaline, least mean squares methods, maximum likelihood estimation, nonlinear channel equalization, nonlinear equalization, nonlinear minimum mean square error estimator, regression, regression analysis, short training sequences, Support vector machines},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}